Skip to main content
Category

Cotton News

June 7, 2024

Welcome to the June 7, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Texas High Plains Crop Conditions Are a Mixed Bag, Per Usual

While planters are still rolling, it’s estimated that 75% of the Texas High Plains cotton planting has been completed. Some areas have received moisture over the spring while others are still coming up short.

An overturned pivot on U.S. Highway 87 north of Tahoka. PCG Director of Field Services Mark Brown said he saw at least 16 of these pivots overturned from the highway while traveling to Big Spring on June 6.

The storm that went through Levelland, New Home and Tahoka in late May wreaked havoc on the towns and surrounding farmland. PCG Director of Field Services Mark Brown said he counted 16 overturned pivots while driving to Big Spring on June 6. “And that was just what I could see from the highway,” he added. With Hockley County’s planting deadline already passed (June 5) and Lynn County’s planting deadline just around the corner (June 10), the damaged irrigation equipment is concerning for cotton producers in these areas.

While planting conditions are better on the Texas High Plains than they were last year, we’re still looking at a mixed bag of circumstances across the region. Producer reports show the good, bad and the ugly as cotton begins to emerge from the soil. “The leaf was laying right there on the ground and it just looked dehydrated,” said Walt Hagood, producer in Hockley County.

“I’ve seen those cotyledons kind of hunkered down and sometimes you dig and find the roots are in moisture,” said Ken Legé, cotton extension specialist for the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center in Lubbock. “However, when it’s 100 degrees outside, sometimes that soil is 120 to135 degrees, and the effect of the demand has those cotyledons folding.”

Subsoil moisture or rather the lack thereof is causing some challenges for producers in Lubbock County. “When the ground below is so dry, it’s like a big dead battery and it pulls the juice from what you’ve got on top,” said Lubbock producer Burt Heinrich. “The 100-degree weather is obviously a factor, but it’s also the dirt underneath that’s pulling the moisture down below where the root can reach. It makes the inch of rain you get a little more ineffective when the subsoil is parched.”

However, Heinrich went on to add that he has seen some good cotton in the area even with the subsoil challenges. “I would say it’s not the average yet, but a lot of cotton can become close to what we expect to see. We got a rain last night nearly everywhere on our farms, and any rain right now will help that little plant if it doesn’t storm it out.”

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Texas Crop Progress and Conditions Report released June 3, Upland cotton is predominantly in “good” condition at 47% for the week (ending June 2). South Texas’ crop appears to be in good condition, but producers down there are dealing with abnormal drought and need a good rain to maintain the progress they’ve made as they go into their harvest season.

Let’s all continue to pray for timely rains for our producers.

Back to Top

FCIC Board Approves New Subsidy Rate for ECO Beginning with 2025 Insurance Year

The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Board of Directors met May 23 and approved an increase in the subsidy rate growers will receive when purchasing the Enhanced Coverage Option (ECO). This change will come into effect with the 2025 insurance year, which begins with policies sold after July 1, 2024.

With the change ECO will now receive a 65 percent premium subsidy rate – an increase of 21 percentage points from the endorsement’s current 44 percent level.

The change, which is effective regardless of the outcome of current farm bill discussions, brings the ECO endorsement subsidy to the same level as the existing subsidy rate provided for the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) endorsement. The higher ECO subsidy level could increase interest in ECO among producers by reducing the cost of the coverage.

ECO is a companion policy that can provide additional county-based shallow-loss coverage on top of the coverage provided by an underlying multi-peril revenue or yield policy and/or a Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) endorsement. ECO protection can be selected to cover losses beginning at 90% or 95% of a county’s expected revenue for the insured crop.

The ECO endorsement cannot be purchased when a producer buys the Stacked Income Protection Plan (STAX) on cotton. Since ECO does not provide coverage that overlaps the protection provided by the USDA FSA Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) program, a grower may participate in ECO and ARC simultaneously as long as they have not also purchased an SCO endorsement.

Back to Top

May 31, 2024

Welcome to the May 31, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Farm Bill 2024: Are You in the Arena or Sitting in the Cheap Seats?

By Kara Bishop

I’m considering turning off my Google alerts for the phrase “Farm Bill.”

Since the proposed legislation was voted out of committee last week, these have been the headlines from the press:

  • Farm Bill advances from U.S. House Ag Panel but faces a tough row to hoe
  • Vilsack Says House Proposal Threatens Farm Bill Coalition
  • Vilsack Outlines His Opposition to House Farm Bill
  • Farm Bill Clears US House Ag Committee, But Likely Won’t Get Widespread Congressional Support as Revision Process Continues

This is not an exhaustive list — there are loads more. This is the vibe and media pitch that everyone is inundated with right now. While it’s not wrong to report the ins and outs of the legislative process for something like the Farm Bill, the press tends to focus on the negative. The talking heads seem to focus on the negative. And it’s exhausting to read it all.

I can’t imagine what it’s like having to experience it as a producer trying to make a living when all you hear is:

  • “It’s never going to get passed out of the House.”
  • “The Senate will never compromise to pass this bill.”
  • “It’s going to be extended. There’s no way we have a farm bill in 2024.”

There’s always going to be noise that is irrelevant to action. There is always going to be someone weighing in from the sidelines not doing the work, sitting in the cheap seats issuing opinions without evidence. What’s frustrating, and even a little surprising, is that some of the Monday-morning quarterbacks on the 2024 Farm Bill are in agriculture.

On April 23, 1910, former president Theodore Roosevelt delivered one of the most powerful speeches in U.S. history while touring Europe. That day, 25,000 people packed the streets of Paris to hear him speak.

To sum up, it’s basically a rant on cynics looking down on people who try to make the world a better place. This is my favorite excerpt; taken from a sign I have in my office:

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is not effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement. And who at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.  

House Ag Committee Chair Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA) is in the arena. There are multiple Representatives and Senators in the arena fighting for farmers with him. And PCG stands with them.

We’ve had talking heads, politicians and some agriculture groups saying there will not be a farm bill this year. That we will have an extension. I mean, it’s bad enough that the media is beating that drum, but even some of our own are adding to the proverbial noise. It’s getting one-sided and loud.

I understand there are challenges and a million tiny pieces that must line up just perfectly right for the 2024 Farm Bill to become law. I understand that the reality on the ground is an uphill battle — hasn’t that been the case with almost every farm bill? What I don’t understand is why some are making it harder for our advocates by agreeing with the obstacles rather than rising above them. The naysayers need to believe.

Because what is told to the press and published on communication channels gets back to our lawmakers. And they need to believe, too. They need a little support and motivation from agriculture to keep fighting the good fight.

Because we have some vocal opponents. Some loud opponents to this House Ag Committee Farm Bill Proposal — including the secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Why would anyone feed their noise when we can make our own?

The answer to questions about the farm bill that just passed out of the House Ag Committee is simple: We need this farm bill. It’s a good bill. It’s bipartisan. (There were four democrats that voted it out of committee when all the noise said there might be one.) It provides an actual farm safety net that could do producers and industry alike some real good for the next five years. And we need it because we grow the food and fiber of the world in an abundant and safe way for everyone.

Let’s make some noise as believers.

Back to Top

How Would New Payment Limit Work Under House Farm Bill Proposal?

Farm CPA Report with Paul Neiffer

The House Farm Bill proposal has an option to increase the payment limit from the current $125,000 to $155,000 beginning with the 2025 crop year and then index it to inflation. However, in order to qualify for the increase, your adjusted gross income (AGI) from farming must be greater than 75% compared to total AGI.

The wording of the bill indicates that this test is applied to an individual or entity but does not include the new “qualified pass-through” entity. Therefore, the test for any entity taxed as a partnership or S corporation will be determined at the owner level to see if either the $125,000 or $155,000 limit will apply.

Let’s look at some examples (these are based on a three-year average):

Gretchen has a Schedule F that shows $75,000 of net income including any related equipment gains on Form 4797. Her spouse shows $50,000 of wage income. As a couple, Gretchen would not qualify for the increased payment limit. However, she may get an attorney or CPA to write a letter indicating if she filed separately then she would qualify. But remember, the increased payment limit only helps if she has payments greater than $125,000.

Let’s assume that Gretchen is single and has Schedule F income of $65,000 and also works in town making $30,000. She would not qualify for the increased payment limit.

ABC Farm Corporation has $200,000 of farm income reported on a substitute Schedule F but has income of $100,000 from wind turbine leases. FSA considers all of this income to be farm income and would qualify for the increase.

ABC Farm Corporation has $500,000 of farm income, but also $200,000 of income from an investment in a non-farm activity. Since farm income is less than 75% of total income, then the corporation does not qualify for the increase.

Let’s assume that ABC Farm Corporation has four equal owners who all have farm AGI over 75%. Since this is an C corporation, the payment limit remains at $125/155,000. However, if it was an S corporation, its payment limit would be four times as high, however, it is likely there would be a reduction since all of the owners likely received farm program payments too. Remember, that the maximum is split between entities and owners to make sure the payments do not exceed the maximum allocated jointly between owners and entities.

As an example, assume that the corporation qualified for $500,000 of payments and each of the four owners qualified for $100,000 for total qualified payments of $900,000. The maximum that can be paid to the corporation and the four owners if $620,000 (4 X $155,000) and thus a pro-rata reduction would be applied.

XYZ Farms LLC has four equal owners. The LLC qualifies for $700,000 of payments, however, three of the owners have farm AGI less than 75%, therefore, the LLC will only receive $530,000 instead of the maximum $620,000 allowed if all four had farm AGI over 75%.

MNO Farms, a general partnership, qualifies for $1 million of farm program payments. It has 7 equal owners, however, none of them have farm AGI greater than 75%, therefore, the partnership will only receive $875,000 instead of the full $1 million if all were greater than 75%. Also, if any of the owners received a payment, then a pro-rata reduction would be applied to MNO payment too.

Now, let’s assume that MNO Farms only has four actively involved owners and the other three are not involved at all. Of the four actively involved farmers, three have farm AGI over 75% and one does not. In this case, the total amount of farm payments allowed is three @ $155,000 and one @ $125,000 or a total of $590,000. The three that are not involved removes those payment limits from the calculation. Also, pro-rata reduction may be applied to MNO.

As you can see, in some cases you will get the increase and in other cases you would not. However, this is just a proposal, and it will require the House to vote yes on it and for the Senate to agree. This likely will not happen but we may be pleasantly surprised.

We will keep you posted.

Back to Top

May 24, 2024

Welcome to the May 24, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

The Farm Bill “Super Bowl” – First Quarter

It’s been a while since I’ve gone to Washington D.C. and returned home energized. For the first time in a long time, I saw governance for the people in action. Just like watching a really good football game that you think about for years to come, yesterday’s markup session was nothing short of epic.

Coin toss
House prevails and chooses to receive; the 2024 Farm Bill is finally underway.

Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson has done a masterful job in serving as the “quarterback” of the Committee. He and most of his colleagues from both sides of the aisle have spent the last three years traveling to learn about agriculture issues, challenges and needs in farm country. All offseason they’ve been preparing for the traditional five-year game known as the The Farm Bill.

Offense, You’re Up
Right before sending him into the game, Coach Herman Boone in “Remember the Titans” said to QB Ronnie Bass:  “You’re the colonel, you’re going to command your troops!” That’s exactly what Chairman Thompson did in a stately and poetic fashion during the lengthy committee markup of one of the most robust Farm Bills crafted since 2002.

May 23 was an epic day. While the House Agriculture Committee is a frequently visited place, the markup event amassed collective agriculture and non-agriculture groups all in the same place. Some aligned on issues and others not, but respectfully coming together to collaborate and work on a comprehensive legislative package that benefits agriculture and nutrition-based initiatives important to both Republicans and Democrats.

PCG attends an event for House Ag Committee Chair Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA) and Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX).

It was ecliptic. Congress functioned for the first time in a long time. They introduced and debated tough issues and amendments on an important piece of legislation to the overall people. And, as intended by the founders of democracy, voted on them based on the need of their constituents. It was a good day to be on The Hill.

The House Playbook
Plains Cotton Growers proudly support this legislation. It is the culmination of years of work by the seven segments of cotton: producers, ginners, warehousers, merchants, cottonseed, cooperatives, and manufacturers can all benefit from this legislation.

While there are many positive provisions within the mark, the following are especially worth highlighting for the Texas cotton industry:

  • Increasing the statutory reference price for seed cotton to 42 cents per pound;
  • Enhancing the premium support for the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) to 80 percent, along with boosting the top coverage level to 90%;
  • Raising the Marketing Assistance Loan (MAL) rate for Upland cotton to 55 cents per pound and for extra-long staple (PIMA) cotton to one dollar per pound — coupled with enhancements to the MAL repayment provisions that will improve cotton’s overall competitiveness and flow;
  • Including harvest incentive research to support cotton producers and cotton infrastructure in times of peril; and
  • Substantially increasing the funding for the Market Access Program and Foreign Market Development Program.

PCG is proud of the yeoman’s work that has taken place by many helping hands to get us to this point. Years of development and strategy on enhancing policy are now coming to fruition.

The next steps are to secure floor time for the House Ag Committee mark and the Senate to take the field.

While the process seams murky, I am optimistic we will get a Farm Bill done by the end of the year — one that producers and industry alike will be proud of.

Stay tuned for the Second Quarter.

Back to Top

May 17, 2024

Welcome to the May 17, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

The Ripple Effect

By Kara Bishop

Every year, the North Plains Groundwater Conservation District puts on the Save the Planet Water Festival for fourth-grade students in the Panhandle.  And every year, the students walk into the classroom for the cotton session that we host confused about why cotton is at the water festival.

They may be confused, but they’re still excited. It’s one of the highlights of my year to go to this event and see nine- and ten-year old children excited about cotton. To see them light up when I tell them cotton is in ice cream and money. To see them immediately try to take their shirts off to check their clothing label after we talk about the damage microplastics in water can do to humans and wildlife alike. To see them excited when they realize their water festival T-shirt is 100% cotton.

And by the end of the day, nearly 300 students have been told to check their clothing labels for cotton, to purchase cotton-rich apparel and to tell everyone they know to do the same.

This type of outreach doesn’t get the same attention as others. It’s not considered a top priority for everyone. But I would argue it’s one of the most important things that we do. One of the most effective ways to create a consumer demand for cotton is to start with the young minds.

When they’re in the halls comparing how much cotton they have in their clothes, I see cotton’s future. And that may seem dramatic, but my son is nearly in fourth grade, and he brings home information to me all the time and insists that we act on it. These children can influence their families in ways that we underestimate.

And who knows? Maybe some of them will tell their familes about the amount of plastic humans consume in a week — in large part to washing polyester clothes — and it will be the change we’ve been waiting to see.

It was a great week in Perryton and Dalhart. We appreciate North Plains Groundwater Conservation District for allowing us to be a part of this important education opportunity. And God bless these kids — they love to learn and now they love cotton!

Back to Top

USDA NASS Final 2023 County Production Estimates Released

The USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) released final county production estimates for Upland cotton on Friday, May 10 and the data shows Texas produced 2.7 million Upland cotton bales in 2023. Texas High Plains cotton production is an estimated 1,468,151 bales for the year.

Among High Plains counties that have official NASS data to review, only 5 counties produced more than 100,000 bales in 2023. Those counties were: Lubbock -177,500; Crosby – 134,500; Floyd – 134,000; Hockley – 130,000; and Hale – 119,000.

According to the January 2, 2024 USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) Certified Acreage report High Plains producers planted 3.442 million acres in 2023, while acres remaining for harvest totaled 1.341 million. Weather related losses led to 60% abandonment of planted acres in the region.

The USDA NASS data is a testament to the tough growing conditions that plagued the state in 2023. Unfortunately, the agency only published county-level data for 61 of the 162 counties that planted cotton in 2023, which equates to only 38% of raw data reported.

Only 22 counties in PCG’s  42-county service area had official USDA NASS data released. Production from the remaining counties was estimated using a calculated USDA NASS district average yield from published county data and January certified acreage data.

The preceding paragraphs lead to a question of NASS relevancy. Is this USDA faction useful anymore? Given their recent discontinuation of the cotton objective yield survey and all county estimates for crops and livestock, which is data that industry has relied upon for years, it’s certainly something to think about. While we appreciate our colleagues at the state and regional offices who strive to do their job, the necessity of this entity, given the way they operate at the federal level, is definitely questionable.

STAX Payments Likely

It appears most of the cotton producers across the High Plains who purchased coverage under the 2023 Stacked Income Protection Plan will receive indemnity payments under the policy.

This should certainly be the case for non-irrigated acres covered under a 2023 STAX policy, as almost every High Plains County is likely to see a maximum indemnity payment calculated. For irrigated cotton the STAX payment outlook is less clear, although most counties are expected to see some level of indemnity.

Using USDA data to get a sense for where final STAX yields might land it appears that irrigated cotton in most High Plains counties is likely to receive some level of payment under the 2023 STAX policy. A majority of irrigated STAX payments are likely to be less than the maximum possible under the policy.

Irrigated STAX policies in two counties, Hale and Crosby, appear to be “on the bubble” in terms of triggering a 2023 STAX payment. Whether or not these two counties trigger an irrigated STAX payment will depend on the final production numbers reported to USDA Risk Management Agency.

Final payment amounts will be determined by the USDA Risk Management Agency using 2023 production data reported by producers.

Back to Top

Upcoming Events

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 24, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

South Plains Field Scout School
Date: May 31, 2024
Location: Hale County Extension Office, Plainview, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: June 7, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

 

For a full list of upcoming events, see the Events Page.

Back to Top

May 10, 2024

Welcome to the May 10, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Wanted: Lost Sheep to be Found

By Kara Bishop

It’s May, which means you are seeing the #mentalhealthawareness posts all over social media. I sometimes struggle with the idea of telling people there’s help and just listing the resources. Not to devalue the intention, but as a realist, I know we can do more. And I understand the need for community and industry resources for this issue. I know they serve an important purpose, and I’m going to include a list of them at the bottom of this article. I just don’t think that’s the difference maker for everyone. It wasn’t for me.

The Parable of the Lost Sheep is one of my favorite stories in the bible. I like it because there have been multiple times throughout my short life that I have been “the one.” Maybe not lost in sin but lost in a dark mental state. Confident that no one could pull me out. Confident that no one would try.

It’s a short story, but I’m going to take the liberty of inference and suggest that it wasn’t easy to locate that one sheep that got lost, especially through mountainous terrain. How long did the man in the parable look? How hard did he look? He had 99 safe sheep so what did it matter that one was lost? Apparently one lost sheep was everything to the man. Lost sheep are everything to Jesus. They should mean everything to us.

It can be easy to spiral when your occupation is 85% uncertainty and 100% sheer force of will. You get to the point where you think it’s never going to work out. And then you have a good year and can’t enjoy it to its fullest, because you’re afraid the next year will be bad.

You may feel the need to shut yourself off from the world, family, friends, or community. You may become the lost sheep. But it’s our job as those who care about you to pull you back out.

Agriculture has always been the community that looks after its neighbor. That’s never been in question — just look at the Panhandle wildfires. Look at all the charity and service and effort people poured into their hurting neighbors.

But mental health isn’t really an area we excel in. It’s not something we like talking about and statistics are not on our side. Mental health takes an effort like nothing else does, because you may have to help when it’s not well received.

It takes tenacity when it comes to helping those who think they aren’t worth it. I’m in a text thread with my mom and sister. If I don’t respond all day to any of the conversation, one of them finds me — they have my location on their phones. They don’t care how I feel about it or if I’m wanting to talk. It’s not good for me to repress whatever emotion I’m experiencing, and they know that. So they dig it out of me. And that is the difference maker.

Obviously, I’m not the textbook case for how to handle someone dealing with mental health issues. That approach won’t work with everyone. But finding what does work for the individuals you’re close to is going to require the same effort as the man searching for the one lost sheep. And quite frankly, it’s easier to share a social media post for mental health awareness month.

We can all name someone who has went through or is going through a hard time right now — have we checked on them? I know we don’t want to interfere with someone’s life or seem nosy but trust me — I’ve never seen someone regret prying into their beloved family member or friend’s life.

But I have seen them mourn every day not checking on that friend or loved one when the mental health battle has been lost. You’re not going to be able to prevent everything and save everyone, but we can all do the best we can to remain plugged in to our communities, family circles and friendships. Stay alert and keep looking for that lost sheep. You won’t regret the effort you made — and you might save a life.

Mental Health Resources:

988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline: call or text 988 or visit 988lifeline.org

AgriStress Helpline for Texas – Southwest AgCenter: 833-897-2474

Mental Health Counseling – South Texas Rural Health Services: 830-879-3047 or SouthTexasRuralHealth.com

Mental Health Crisis Services – Texas Health and Human Services: hhs.texas.gov

Back to Top

Upcoming Events

OC Playa Field Day
Date: May 16, 2024
Location: Floyd County Friends Unity Center

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 24, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

South Plains Field Scout School
Date: May 31, 2024
Location: Hale County Extension Office, Plainview, Texas

 

For a full list of upcoming events, see the Events Page.

Back to Top

April 26, 2024

Welcome to the April 26, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Texas High Plains Planting Conditions Forecast

By Ken Legé , Texas A&M AgriLife Cotton Extension Specialist, Lubbock Center

It is that time of year to look at planting conditions — considering moisture, air and soil temperatures, and planting capacities to determine planting start dates.

We will cover two planting conditions forecasts, each with 3 specific locations. They both show the high and low temperatures, as well as precipitation forecast percentage. I have calculated the DD60s for each day, and a 5-d DD60 accumulation total for the next five days. I’ve added some commentary to help producers plan planting operations. Most comments consider field soil moisture and soil temperatures.

2024 TX Panhandle Planting Conditions Forecast – April 22, 2024

Locations for this forecast include the following:

  • Spearman, Texas
  • Panhandle, Texas
  • Dumas, Texas

For all three locations, my commentary is the same:  Although forecast highs for the next few days are generally warmer than average, the lows predicted for the next few days pose some risk for chilling injury and/or seedling death. I recommend waiting for warmer temperatures.

Soil temperatures are in the upper 50s to lower 60s in the region.

Note that planting date data suggests April plantings are inconsistent with regard to yield potential. Planting during the second and third week of May have produced more consistent stands and yields in the Texas Panhandle region, on average.

Click the image to download PDF.

2024 Southern HP Planting Conditions Forecast – April 22, 2024

For this forecast, commentary will be added to the Plainview location separate from the other two.

  • Plainview, Texas

Today’s (April 22) forecast includes some rather cool temperatures that are not conducive to rapid emergence — do not plant.

Tuesday and Wednesday of  this week (4/23 and 4/24) offer some warmer temperatures; however, unless planting capacity/total acreage requires otherwise, my recommendation is to wait for warmer temperatures.

The remainder of the week cools down quite a bit, especially Saturday and Sunday (4/27 and 4/28) — do not plant.

  • Lubbock, TX
  • Lamesa, TX

The recommendations for Lubbock and Lamesa areas are similar.  Warmer than average temperatures will tempt producers to put some cottonseed in the ground; however, planting date data suggests that our most consistent yields result when cotton is planted during the last half of May, and in the case of Lamesa, that optimum period extends into early June. Unless producers are worried about losing the soil moisture they currently have, I suggest waiting until May to plant.

Soil temperatures are in the upper 50s to lower 60s following the rainfall the region received over the last week or so. Warmer soil temperatures would be more conducive to rapid emergence.

Click on the image to download the PDF.

I will send out these Planting Conditions Forecasts weekly throughout the planting season to aid planting decisions. These forecasts are not iron-clad, because the weather forecasts change frequently.  However, the purpose of these weekly forecasts is to get growers, and others who consult them, to consider temperature and rainfall forecasts in a logical manner before making the commitment to plant cottonseed, which is one of the highest input costs for a cotton crop.

To obtain information on a specific location (down to the field level), tailored planting conditions forecasts can be accessed from North Carolina State University.  Go to: 
https://products.climate.ncsu.edu/ag/cotton-planting/ 

The map will default to a location in North Carolina, but you can scroll the map to your specific location and click on a field. Click ‘submit’ and the tool will provide a two-day planting conditions forecast with commentary.

I would also suggest that growers know the actual warm and cool germs on their lot(s) of cottonseed. The cool germ especially provides you with important information about realistic expectations on emergence.

Contact your local retailer or seed company representative who can provide you with that critical information.

Back to Top

Upcoming Events

Northern Panhandle Field Scouting School
Date: April 30, 2024
Location: Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Amarillo

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 10, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

OC Playa Field Day
Date: May 16, 2024
Location: Floyd County Friends Unity Center

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 24, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

 

For a full list of upcoming events, see the Events Page.

Back to Top

April 19, 2024

Welcome to the April 19, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Talk to the 90%

It’s Time for Conservationists to Start Screaming from the Rooftops

By Kara Bishop

In preparation for Earth Day, which is Monday April 22, I thought I would get on my soapbox for this week’s newsletter.

We have heard it time and time again: farmers and ranchers are the original conservationists. Farmers are stewards of the land. Farmers want the environment to thrive so they can pass their operation down to the next generation. Farmers engage in agronomic practices that are beneficial to the earth and were doing it long before it was federally mandated.

The key word in the preceding paragraph is “we.”

WE are in agriculture. WE understand the mechanics of farming and ranching. WE live here. WE are in the soil day in and day out. WE talk to farmers from other areas and understand geographic diversity requires different practices.

It’s not about making sure WE know these things. It’s about telling THEM — the consumers; the decision makers who determine demand for our product.

American farm families represent 2% of the U.S. population. That’s it. And they feed and clothe the other 98%. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, roughly 10% of the total U.S. population is involved in agriculture in some way. That means that 90% of U.S. residents need to be communicated with regarding their food and fiber.

We talk to each other and share cool sustainability facts and agronomic practices with one another. Obviously, we need to communicate and share these things to advance our industry, but we also need to share these same stories with those who aren’t involved in agriculture.

Because they are the ones making the purchasing decisions. And as far as you and I are concerned, we need them to choose cotton. Not just for our industry, but because it’s best for the environment. Choosing cotton clothing and household items contributes to saving the planet.

Most of the people making the purchasing decisions for their clothes care about the planet — especially younger generations. Though many of the “earth conscious,” are ironically wearing 100% polyester active wear. And that’s on us.

Don’t get me wrong, I know we’re fighting an uphill battle with the price difference between cotton and synthetic fibers, but we’re making it harder by feeding the agricultural stigma on “sustainability.”

We tend to resist the conversation on sustainability. And I get it. It’s hard to want to engage in that conversation when you’ve been practicing sustainability for years. It’s hard to engage when false narratives are swirling around you about farming and ranching harming the planet rather than preserving it. It’s hard to engage in that conversation when retailers and brands preach sustainability, yet don’t provide a variety of affordable cotton options in stores.

We all know that if we don’t tell our story, someone else will. So many earth conscious “experts” still discuss “dirty cotton” and how it’s harming both farmers and consumers. While the cotton industry is fighting back on this, it’s the squeaky wheel that gets the grease. And, let’s face it, more voices are squeaking harder about you and your practices that they know nothing about.

I’ll be honest — I never checked my clothing labels before I took this job. It never even occurred to me that synthetics might be harming the oceans. And I have lived my entire life in cotton country.

We’ve got to be better about getting the word out. We’ve all got to start pounding hard on that drum. It needs to be in every conversation we have with those who aren’t familiar with what we do. We assume that the people living among us already know these things, but I promise you they don’t. I didn’t.

Here’s the facts from Cotton Incorporated:

  • 14 million metric tons of plastic are released into the oceans every year.
  • Every time clothes are washed, microfibers enter our waterways. These fibers are too small to be completely filtered by wastewater treatment equipment.
  • Cotton breaks down in water in just over three months, which is a rate similar to oak leaves.
  • However, synthetic fibers take 20 to 200 years to break down in the same environment.
  • Fibers from synthetic clothing make up 35% of the microplastics in our oceans.
  • By 2050, there may be more plastic in our oceans than fish.
  • 81% of tested water samples from major metro areas around the world were contaminated with plastic fibers.
  • This microplastic waste affects everything in the ecosystem — including what we eat.
  • The average person consumes approximately a credit card worth of plastic every week.

This is the narrative that needs to be shouted — on Earth Day and every day. I didn’t share this just to share it. Tell your friends.

We all know if consumers demand more cotton, then more cotton products end up in the supply. One producer told me just a few days ago that he can’t find 100% cotton socks in stores. I found that hard to believe, so I conducted my own experiment.

I went to Walmart and JCPenney and looked at their sock selection. At JCPenney, they had some socks that contained upwards of 71% cotton, but the majority of socks were polyester dominant. Walmart had very little cotton in their socks. In the women’s sock aisle, there were only a handful of packages that contained cotton and the most was 50%. Most of the socks were 85% polyester and 15% recycled polyester.

While cotton blends are great, and we’re glad they’re including cotton in their products, I was really surprised that cotton doesn’t own the market on socks. Seems like a no-brainer to me with the odor control and cooling effects that cotton provides.

The real kicker is some of the Hanes brand socks had the following tagline on the back: Responsible. Sustainable. Comfortable. On the same back of that package were the fabric contents: 49% polyester, 43% cotton, 6% rayon, 2% spandex. Is that considered sustainable apparel? If it takes 20 to 200 years for half of the sock to break down, assuming it ended up in the ocean, is that truly responsible and sustainable?

Another industry representative commented in a meeting that he was at the 2024 Master’s Tournament at Augusta National Golf Club where there were 105 golf shirts for sale. Three of the 105 were 100% cotton and two were cotton blends. The 100 shirts remaining? All synthetic.

We have great research at our disposal. We have the facts on our side. Let’s work together and share cotton’s sustainability story — for the good of the planet and the cotton industry. Buy cotton. It’s the sustainable fabric of our life and planet!

Back to Top

Upcoming Events

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 10, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 24, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: June 7, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

 

For a full list of upcoming events, see the Events Page.

Back to Top

April 12, 2024

Welcome to the April 12, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Plains Cotton Growers Inc. Conducts Elections for 2024-2025 Term

At the Plains Cotton Growers Board of Directors Meeting April 1, the organization conducted officer and executive committee elections. PCG board chairman Brent Nelson rotated off of the officer team, but will continue serving on the PCG PAC board as a trustee.

The new PCG officer team for the next two years consist of the following:

President — Travis Mires, O’donnell, Texas

Vice President — Brent Coker, SpringLake-Earth, Texas

Secretary/Treasurer — Jon Jones, Floydada, Texas

Chairman — Martin Stoerner, Lockney, Texas

“We want to thank Brent for his service to our industry and organization over the last eight years,” Stoerner said at the board meeting April 1. “I appreciate the example he provided for me before I stepped into this role.”

As Stoerner steps into the chairman role, he will also serve as a trustee on the PCG PAC board.

The PCG executive committee election results:

Three representatives from each district of PCG are elected to serve on the organization’s executive committee. The current representatives for 2024 to 2025 are the following:

District One

Kyle Benson, Hale Center; Steve Olson, Plainview; Jordy Rowland, Dimmitt

District Two

David Carter, Levelland; Scott Harmon, Idalou; Rex Kennedy, Lubbock

District Three

Jeremy Brown, Lamesa; Cody Ellison, Denver City; Carl Pepper, Borden County

The executive committee of the PCG Board of Directors guides the organization in financial and staffing decisions.

“We’re excited for the upcoming crop year and blessed as an organization to have the support of our officers, executive committee and board of directors as a whole,” said PCG CEO Kody Bessent.

Back to Top

Upcoming Events

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 10, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 24, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: June 7, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

 

For a full list of upcoming events, see the Events Page.

Back to Top

April 5, 2024

Welcome to the April 5, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Discrimination Lawsuit Filed Against USDA for Implementation of 2022 Emergency Relief Program

A lawsuit was filed against USDA in the U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas – Amarillo Division last Friday (March 29) by Texas farmers for discrimination in USDA’s methodology of the 2022 Emergency Relief Program (ERP).

USDA set a dangerous precedent in the design of the 2022 ERP. While the 2020-2021 program provided adequate disaster relief based on insurance records in phase 1, USDA began shifting toward tax record evaluation in phase 2. Despite heavy feedback on the challenges with 2020-2021 ERP phase 2 from producers and agricultural groups, the shift became more drastic in the 2022 ERP.

USDA enacted a new progressive payment factor for 2022 ERP on their own accord, deviating further away from the methodology used for 2020-2021 ERP — disregarding the legislative intent of how the disaster relief should be distributed. Essentially, with the way the 2022 program was set up, farmers with some of the heaviest losses received the least amount of aid if they did not qualify as a socially disadvantaged producer or entity.

When challenged on his implementation of the 2022 program, Secretary Vilsack dismissed the unequal distribution of aid, claiming Congress did not provide him with adequate funding. If the philosophy used to develop the 2022 program goes unchecked, we will see even more discriminatory actions from USDA. We hope this suit will set a new precedent for fair and equal distribution of disaster relief funds in the future.

Representing the plaintiffs is the Southeastern Legal Foundation, a national nonprofit legal organization dedicated to defending liberty who have handled similar cases in the past. PCG will keep you updated of ongoing developments within this case.

Back to Top

The 67th PCG Annual Meeting Proves the Future is Bright

April 2 was a good day.

More than 330 producers and industry representatives gathered at the Overton Hotel & Conference Center in Lubbock, Texas, for the 67th annual meeting of Plains Cotton Growers Inc.

The theme for this year’s meeting was “Build for the Future,” which was woven throughout the day in our general session segments and breakout sessions. Here are the highlights.

The U.S. Farm Report was taped at the annual meeting on April 2 and will air on Saturday morning at April 6.

The U.S. Farm Report

U.S. Farm Report Host Tyne Morgan led a roundtable discussion with National Cotton Council Vice President of Economics and Policy Analysis Jody Campiche, Texas A&M University Agricultural Food and Policy Center Co-Director Bart Fischer, and Combest, Sell & Associates Chief Economist Brad Weddelman. The discussion involved how the current economic outlook of the cotton industry would affect future decisions and outcomes.

The episode will air April 6, Saturday morning, on local affiliates and RFD-TV.

Cotton Segment Panel

Cotton Segment Panel

Following the U.S. Farm Report, PCCA CEO and President Kevin Brinkley moderated a panel representing six segments of the cotton industry. Panelists included Spring-Lake Earth Producer and PCG Officer Brent Coker, North Gin Manager Jordy Rowland, Farmers Cooperative Compress President and CEO Eric Wanjura, PYCO Industries President Robert Lacy, and American Cotton Shippers Association President Buddy Allen.

When discussing hard times, Lacy said the following regarding the future:

“None of us would be in this business if we didn’t have faith. We all remember hard years in our careers that we weren’t sure we were going to make it out of, but we’re still here. I have faith that we will have good times again.”

Keynote Speaker David Avrin

Keynote Speaker David Avrin

Customer service expert David Avrin discussed future proofing businesses through service and management.

Here are some key takeaways:

  • You have to do business as if every one of your customers is armed with a video camera — because they are.
  • 63% say a convenient customer experience is more important than a friendly customer experience. – 2022 ACA Report
  • There is 100 times a better chance of winning the business with a reply within five minutes. – Harvard Business Review

We are so appreciative of our membership and industry friends for spending the day with us and for our sponsors who made the whole event possible.

Platinum: AgTexas, Capital Farm Credit, StoneX

Gold: BASF, Deltapine

Silver: Farmers Cooperative Compress, West Texas A&M University

Bronze: First United Bank, Jolly Crop Insurance, Peoples Bank,  Plains Cotton Cooperative Association, TTU Davis College of Agriculture, Vista Bank, Wellington State Bank

Gray: ECOM USA, Cargill, City Bank, Corteva, Lubbock National Bank, Tucker Oil Company

Other: AgWomen Connect, The Cotton Board, Sound Agriculture

Back to Top

Upcoming Events

Lower Rolling Plains Ag Conference
Date: April 10, 2024
Location: Scurry County Coliseum, Snyder, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: April 12, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers Advisory Group Meeting
Date: May 10, 2024
Location: PCG Conference Room, Lubbock, Texas

For a full list of upcoming events, see the Events Page.

Back to Top

March 22, 2024

Welcome to the March 15, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Editor’s Note: The email sent Friday, March 22, included information about the Agricultural Pesticides Waste Collection Event. This event has been postponed. Details to follow – stay tuned.

Key Issues Addressed at House Ag Appropriations Subcommittee Hearing

As reported by Jim Wiesemeyer, ProFarmer

At the House Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee held a hearing on 2025 budget requests from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The subcommittee heard from USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack regarding this request, which is set at $25.1 billion — a $2.2 billion increase from the previous year. Here are some key issues addressed by Vilsack and the subcommittee.

Key Issues

Commodity Credit Corporation

Subcommittee Chair Andy Harris (R-MD) expressed apprehension about the potential misuse of Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) funds to advance political agendas not authorized by Congress. Harris said he is concerned that the CCC “continues to be treated like a slush fund to advance political priorities not directed by Congress.” He also noted that he has read Vilsack’s comments in news articles over the past few weeks “suggesting that you can use CCC funds to help farm safety net programs outside of the regular farm bill process,” adding he is “perplexed as to how USDA would be able to do this, as establishing reference prices and farm programs is done by Congress, the Legislative branch, not the Executive branch.” He said he hoped his colleagues at the House and Senate Ag Committees can complete a farm bill this year, “but if not, that does not give USDA the green light to start raiding the CCC to de facto set up new programs not authorized by Congress.”

Vilsack told Harris he wants “to make sure that you and I have a meeting of our minds on the utilization of CCC as it relates to the farm bill. I never suggested nor did I ever say that we would be using the CCC outside the scope of farm bill discussions and negotiations. What I did say was, in order for us to have a farm bill, it’s going to be necessary for members of the Ag Committee to be creative how they can use the resources within the CCC at their instruction and direction to be able to provide the relief and assistance they’re looking for to bolster our safety net. That’s what I said, that’s what I meant, and I just want to make sure the record is clear about that.”

Farm Income

Ranking Subcommittee member Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.) noted that in 2022 when net cash farm income reached a record high at over $200 billion, 13% of commercial farms, 50% of intermediate farms and 63% of resident farms had negative farm income. He that Vilsack’s prepared remarks mentioned several programs that help grow markets for American farmers that receive mandatory funding. Bishop asked: “How can we on the Appropriations Committee support and grow the farm economy on the discretionary side of the budget?” Vilsack quickly answered, “Continued support for local and regional food systems. The reason being that when farmers are operating under the normal food system, they get roughly anywhere from $0.15 to $0.20 of the food dollar. When they sell locally directly to their consumer, they get anywhere from $0.50 to $0.75 of the food dollar. So, to the degree to which you can continue to support local and regional food systems and the programs that are already in USDA, supporting our processing initiative, for example. Continuing to support renewable energy production. Why? Because it’s an opportunity for a new commodity, a new stream of income for producers.” Vilsack added are the transitioning to more renewable sources of energy. “Farmers have the ability to provide excess energy and therefore additional income. And finally, making sure that we continue to support the conversion of agricultural waste into a wide variety of bio-based products, everything from sustainable aviation fuel to bioplastics and everything in between.”

Aid to Cotton and Peanut Growers

Rep. Bishop said that he is hearing from a lot of peanut and cotton growers from the southeast as well as agribusiness owners and bankers, that farmers are struggling financially. “Much of it is due to the dramatic increase in farm input costs, high interest rates, weak exports. And as you know, the financial situation on the farm impacts many aspects of the rural community. With the farm bill not yet in place for the 2024 crop year, would you support a one-time payment to peanut and cotton producers to help them until we can get the farm bill in place for the ‘25 crop year?” Vilsack said he would work with Bishop’s staff to see what might be possible. “I would say that we are continuing to get resources out under the emergency relief program. There are also additional programs and additional opportunities for additional assistance for your producers, in addition to or in lieu of a single payment,” Vilsack added. Bishop then noted that an aid payment was done “previously for rice producers, I think for the 2022 crop, through an appropriations bill.” Vilsack acknowledged that occurred but noted “we had to give up something in order to be able to finance the $250 million that went to rice producers. I’m not sure what you’re willing to give up or what members of this Committee are willing to give up or what I’m willing to give up.”

H 2-A Program

Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.) expressed concerns about the challenges faced by small farms, particularly regarding the rising labor costs under the H-2A program. He highlighted the strain that this places on farmers in his district, many of whom are facing financial hardships and potential closure due to unsustainable wage rate increases. Moolenaar proposed the Supporting Farm Operations Act to pause these increases for two years and provide relief to struggling farmers. However, Vilsack emphasized the need for broader systemic reforms, suggesting that freezing wage increases alone may only delay inevitable problems. The discussion became contentious as Moolenaar pressed Vilsack on his actions to support American farmers and address the Department of Labor’s role in imposing escalating labor costs. Vilsack defended the use of data-driven decisions but faced criticism from Moolenaar, who argued that the current approach threatens the viability of American farms. Despite the heated exchange, Vilsack reiterated his commitment to advocating for farmers and farm workers, emphasizing the importance of finding solutions that benefit both parties. However, Moolenaar remained skeptical and urged Vilsack to take more decisive action to address the challenges faced by American farmers.

Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program

Highlighting the significant increase in funding for the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) nutrition program, Subcommittee Chairman Andy Harris (R-Md.) emphasized the program’s bipartisan support and its importance in providing nutritious support to mothers, infants, and children. However, he raised concerns about the accuracy of USDA’s projections regarding WIC participation and food costs, particularly considering recent claims about decreased inflation and food prices. Harris questioned the necessity of the proposed funding increase for WIC, citing declining participation rates and conflicting data on food costs. He wants to understand the rationale behind the Biden administration’s budget requests.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Ct.) told Vilsack that she was “intrigued by the new proposal to backstop WIC funding so we do not face nutrition assistance cliffhanger like we just went through.”

Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.) raised the issue of shrinkflation, citing an example of reduced milk carton size impacting compliance with WIC rules. He asked whether the WIC food package provided flexibility to cover smaller containers. Vilsack indicated that there may be flexibility in certain circumstances and offered to look into the specific issue raised by Newhouse.

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)

Harris stressed the importance of adhering to legislative directives and urged honest discussions on federal subsidies for “unhealthy food in the SNAP program.” He detailed that over the past 20 years, “multiple cities and states have asked USDA for the ability to restrict SNAP purchases of sugary drinks, but each time those requests have been denied. As we work through the FY ’25 process, it’s important that we look for ways to best return SNAP, the largest food assistance program in America, back to its original purpose of advancing the nutrition needs of participants, not providing empty calories, which in fact could be potentially harmful to long-term health.”

Harris noted that he is a strong supporter of establishing a SNAP pilot program that restricts unhealthy food or beverages from being purchased with SNAP benefits. He said he was disappointed the FY 2024 Appropriations bill did not include funding to implement a small voluntary pilot program to see how it might help with health outcomes and prevent chronic disease. He asked Vilsack if USDA has the authority to approve a demonstration project, which would be similar to a pilot, that allows states to restrict certain foods or beverages. Vilsack said, “We’d have the authority to work collaboratively with the state, assuming that the process contained proper evaluation. One of the big problems, Mr. Chairman, has been the lack of evaluation in what has been presented to us by states and cities in terms of the programs that they want to adopt. There’s a tendency to think this is a relatively simple process… But we would have the authority to do it. But we’d want to make sure, if we did it, that there would be a strong evaluation component to it.”

Harris said he was glad to hear that USDA has the authority to approve a pilot program, but told Vilsack that “since your first appointment as Secretary of Ag, the obesity rates among U.S. adults have increased by almost 9%, from 33.8% in 2007, 2008, to 42% of Americans in 2017, 2018. About half of all Americans now have one or more preventable chronic disease, most of them diet related or linked to diet in some cases. So, given this rise in obesity rates, is there any evidence that the SNAP-Ed and the Healthy Incentive programs have been effective in having reduced obesity among SNAP participants?” Vilsack said there is research to indicate that “the availability of SNAP does result in healthier choices being made by SNAP families.”

Harris also said that along similar lines is the Summer EBT program for children is now permanent. “States operating the Summer EBT run the SNAP model. So again, allowing access to sugary beverages, salty snacks, the whole deal, but interestingly, Indian tribal organizations operate the WIC model. So as I understand it, families receiving Summer EBT under the WIC model are purchasing WIC approved foods, which we both I think recognize are generally much more nutritious foods than the wide variety of foods available under SNAP. Do you think that recipients could benefit if states operate a WIC model under the Summer EBT program like tribal organizations do to ensure that we’re providing kids with healthy food during the summer? Just like USDA does for instance, during the school year and the national school lunch and school breakfast programs? Vilsack responded: “I think it’s more complicated than that.” Vilsack added: “There’s a fairness and a consistency issue. If indeed the goal here is for taxpayer dollars to be directly linked to more nutritious decisions, are you going to make that same decision for a farmer emergency relief? A farmer gets emergency check from the government, cashes it, goes to the grocery store. Are you going to restrict him from — why not? Fundamentally, that’s the issue. It’s absolutely the issue.” Harris countered: “Mr. Secretary, the difference is we’re not buying food for the middle-class people. We’re buying food…” Vilsack interrupted saying, “But you are, absolutely you are if you get any federal assistance.”

Farm Loss and Land Conversion

Rep. Newhouse expressed concerns about the challenges faced by rural communities and family farms, particularly in light of the rate at which farms are disappearing. He highlighted the adverse wage rate as one of the significant costs burdening farmers and emphasized the need for action to rein in labor costs. Vilsack acknowledged the long-standing issue of farm loss and land conversion. Vilsack detailed that “since 1981, the U.S. has lost 544,000 farms. That is the same number of farms that exist today in North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Colorado, Missouri, and Oklahoma. We’ve lost 151 million acres of land that was in farming that’s no longer in farming. That’s the land mass of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Maryland, and most of Virginia. So, this is not a new issue.” Vilsack attributed this trend to a system focused on productivity rather than income sources, leading to income concentration among a small percentage of farms. Vilsack stressed the importance of creating additional revenue streams for farmers to improve their financial stability. Vilsack urged Congress to pass immigration reform, specifically the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, to address labor challenges in agriculture. He emphasized the need for bipartisan cooperation and criticized political obstacles hindering the passage of crucial legislation. Newhouse affirmed efforts to advance the Farm Workforce Modernization Act in both the House and Senate, acknowledging the difficulties in navigating the legislative process.

Threats from China

Rep. Hinson expressed concerns about the safety of the U.S. food supply in the face of potential threats from adversaries like the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). She highlighted the need for better coordination and updated procedures to monitor foreign agricultural land purchases, referencing a recent report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Vilsack acknowledged the progress made in implementing GAO recommendations, including improved coordination with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and efforts to update the Agriculture Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (AFIDA) handbook. He emphasized the challenges posed by the decentralized nature of real estate transactions across the country and the need for ongoing improvements.

Hinson also raised concerns about the heavy reliance on China for critical agricultural inputs such as vitamins B6 and C. Vilsack underscored the importance of reducing reliance on foreign adversaries for key inputs like fertilizer, while acknowledging the delicate balance required in maintaining trade relationships with countries like China, which are significant customers for American agricultural products.

In response to questions about preventing supply chain bottlenecks and incentivizing domestic production, Vilsack suggested leveraging tools like the tax code, rural development programs, and business incentives to encourage investment in domestic production facilities and enhance the business environment for new ventures.

Their discussion highlighted the complex interplay between national security concerns, trade relationships, and domestic production capabilities in ensuring the safety and resilience of the U.S. food supply chain.

Back to Top

Cotton Industry Awards

Our members received some accolades in March!

Thomas Cleveland, TIGA outgoing president with Carson County Gin Manager Keith Mixon.

Thomas Cleveland – Outgoing President

The Texas Independent Ginners Association (TIGA) held its annual meeting March 11-13 where they awarded outgoing president Thomas Cleveland for his service. Cleveland is the superintendent of Carson County Gin in White Deer, Texas.

David Foster, long-time owner of D&J Gin in Floyd County.

David Foster – Distinguished Service 

The TIGA meeting also awarded long-time ginner David Foster for his service to the industry. Foster and his brother Jody bought the gin in 1984 before selling it to Windstar Corporation in 2023. They ginned their one millionth bale in 2022 and have been actively involved and supportive of the cotton industry for more than 35 years.

Guyle Roberson – Cooperative Ginner of the Year

At the Texas Agricultural Cooperative Council annual meeting — held March 17-19 — Guyle Roberson was named Cooperative Ginner of the Year. Roberson manages Texas Producers Coop in Sudan and Amherst, Texas. To learn more about Roberson, you can read his Plains Cotton Growers Faces of Cotton story installment.

Button Text

Upcoming Events

Moore County Gin Grower Appreciation Lunch
Date: March 28, 2024
Location: Moore County Gin, Dumas, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers Board of Directors Meeting
Date: April 1, 2024
Location: Overton Hotel & Conference Center, Lubbock, Texas

Plains Cotton Growers 67th Annual Meeting
Date: April 2, 2024
Location: Overton Hotel & Conference Center, Lubbock, Texas

For a full list of upcoming events, see the Events Page.

Back to Top