Skip to main content
Category

Featured Stories

What You Need to Know About Economic Assistance and Disaster Assistance

Economic Assistance Overview
  • $10 billion in total funding for all eligible commodities
  • 90-day period for USDA implementation
  • Eligibility based on 2024 FSA-certified planted acres and 50% prevent-plant acres
  • Skip-row acreage granted parity with solid plant acreage for this program

What you should know: Assuming Brooke Rollins is confirmed by the Senate as the new Secretary of Agriculture (confirmation hearing scheduled for 10 a.m. ET on January 23, 2025), then the economic assistance will be processed quickly. The 90 days is a deadline the deadline for payments to be completed (March 21, 2025); however, payments will likely be issued before this.

Disaster Assistance Overview:
  • $20.78 billion in total funding for all eligible commodities
  • Applicable to the 2023 and 2024 crop years for qualifying disaster losses

What you should know: We do not yet know how the disaster assistance will be issued or how the payment methodology will be implemented. The development of this program will not begin until we have a confirmed Secretary of Agriculture and could take some time to formulate. We do not have any payment rates or calculations at this time.

January 17, 2025

Welcome to the January 17, 2025 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Get to Know Ag’s Champions in Congress

Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) House Ag Appropriations Chair

Editor’s Note: We are introducing a short series of articles in the next few issues of Cotton News detailing the Representatives and Senators serving on the House Agriculture Committee, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, the House Ag Appropriations and Senate Ag Appropriations Subcommittees.

This issue will feature the Chair and Ranking Member of the House Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration Appropriations. This subcommittee will be referred to as “Ag Appropriations” through the rest of the article.

This subcommittee is tasked with writing legislation that allocates federal funds to government agencies, departments and organizations for the agriculture industry.

Part 2: House Agriculture Appropriations

Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), House Ag Appropriations Chair
  • Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2010.
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital physician
  • Medical officers in the Naval Reserve
  • Served 12 years as a state Senator for Maryland (elected in 1998)

    Bishop Sanford Jr. House Ag Appropriations Ranking Member

  • House Freedom Caucus Chair
Rep. Sanford Bishop Jr. (D-GA) House Ag Appropriations Ranking Member
  • Elected to the House of Representatives in 1993
  • Prior to his current appointment, Bishop was elected to the Georgia House of Representatives in 1977, moving to the Georgia Senate in 1990
  • Was one of four democrats on the House Ag Committee to vote in favor of the bill authored by Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA) in May 2024
  • Served in the U.S. Army
  • Ran a law firm in Georgia prior to government work
Back to Top

Lubbock’s Dustin Burrows Chosen as Texas House Speaker

Texas Rep. Dustin Burrows (District 83) was elected Texas Speaker of the House Tuesday January 14.

The Texas House of Representatives voted for Lubbock lawmaker Dustin Burrows for Speaker of the House on Tuesday, January 14, 2025.

According to the Lubbock-Avalanche Journal, Texas State Representative Dustin Burrows of Lubbock filed to run for speaker of the house in the eleventh hour after Dade Phalen dropped his bid. This placed Burrows against Representative David Cook of Mansfield, Texas.

Burrows chaired the powerful calendars committee and the legislature’s investigative efforts into the 2022 Uvalde shooting in the last two years. He has represented the 83rd district since January 2015.

Back to Top

2024 Cotton Quality Report

Abilene’s average daily number of cotton samples received this week is 4,357. The office is currently 97.4% complete in the classing of their season estimate of samples.

Lamesa’s average daily number of cotton samples received this week is 2,979. The office is currently 95% complete in the classing of their season estimate of samples.

Lubbock’s average daily number of cotton samples received this week is 6,513. The office is 97% complete in the classing of their season estimate of samples. (The gin estimate has been revised to 1,960,000.)

Abilene Report

Lamesa Report

Lubbock Report

Reminder for Gins:

If gins are submitting samples for the Four Bale Module Averaging pilot program, the submitted modules must be designated with a R and they must be in multiples of 4. (4, 8, 12, 16 up to 48).

Back to Top

January 10, 2025

Welcome to the January 10, 2025 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

Get to Know Ag’s Champions in Congress

Editor’s Note: We are introducing a short series of articles in the next few issues of Cotton News detailing the Representatives and Senators serving on the House Agriculture Committee, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, the House Ag Appropriations and Senate Ag Appropriations Subcommittees.

This issue will feature the Chairs and Ranking Members of the House Agriculture Committee and the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry — commonly referred to as the “Four Corners.”

Part 1: The Four Corners

PCG Past President Brent Nelson, Sen. John Boozman (R-AR), PCG Director of Communications Kara Bishop, PCCA President and CEO Kevin Brinkley.

Sen. John Boozman (R-AR), Senate Ag Committee Chair

Background

  • Elected to the U.S. Senate in 2010
  • Fifth-generation Arkansan
  • Played football for the University of Arkansas
  • Entered private practice as an optometrist with his brother
  • Established the low vision program at the Arkansas School for the Blind in Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Volunteer optometrist at an area clinic that provides medical services to low-income families
  • Successfully raised Polled Herefords with his children
Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-PA), House Ag Committee Chair
GT visiting Four Sixes Ranch

PCG CEO Kody Bessent and PCG President Travis Mires attend a fundraiser for House Ag Chairman Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-Pa.) with Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas), at the Four Sixes Ranch in Guthrie, Texas.

Background

Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN), House Ag Committee Ranking Member

Background

  • Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2018
  • Born and raised in Arkansas – moved to Minnesota in 2005
  • Worked as a reporter and in human resources and communications
  • Member of the Minnesota party affiliate Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party
  • Replaced Rep. David Scott (D-GA) as the Ranking Member of the House Ag Committee for the 119th Congress 
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Senate Ag Committee Ranking Member

Background

  • Elected to the U.S. Senate in 2007
  • Partner at two Minneapolis law firms before being elected county attorney of Hennepin County
  • Member of the Minnesota party affiliate Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party
Back to Top

2025 PCG Seed Cost Calculator Now Available

The PCG seed cost calculator is an interactive Microsoft Excel spreadsheet that allows producers to calculate an estimated cost per acre, for both seed and technology, based on published suggested retail prices. The calculator has become a popular tool among producers interested in comparing seed and technology prices as they work to finalize their cotton variety selections.

The 2025 spreadsheet includes updated listings for 115 conventional, Axant Flex, XtendFlex, GlyTol, Bollgard II, Bollgard 3 XtendFlex, Bollgard 3 Thryvon, TwinLink, Enlist and Widestrike varieties, including stacked gene versions of these technologies that are available for sale in West Texas.

Back to Top

2024 Cotton Quality Report

Lamesa’s average daily number of cotton samples received this week is 4,107. The office is currently 89% complete in the classing of their season estimate of samples.

Lubbock’s average daily number of cotton samples received this week is 8,325. The office is 96% complete in the classing of their season estimate of samples. (The gin estimate has been revised to 1,960,000.)

Lamesa Report

Lubbock Report

Reminder for Gins:

If gins are submitting samples for the Four Bale Module Averaging pilot program, the submitted modules must be designated with a R and they must be in multiples of 4. (4, 8, 12, 16 up to 48).

Back to Top

Variety Trial Results: Crosby and Lubbock County

By Ken Legé, Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center Cotton Specialist

We are about 70% harvested with our southern high plains RACE trials, and hopefully will have the remainder in the barn once the much-needed rain moves out.

I have attached all the results to date. An official, final publication will be published after the first of the year, but I want to get these results out in time to be used for variety selection decisions.

We greatly appreciate the support of our grower/cooperators, the seed companies who have invested in these trials, and the monetary support from the Texas State Support Committee of the Cotton Board, and Plains Cotton Growers/Plains Cotton Improvement Program.

Crosby County RACE Trial

Lubbock County RACE Trial

EPA Registers New Herbicide Active Ingredient Glufosinate-P

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is registering the new active ingredient glufosinate-P that controls weeds in conventional and glufosinate-resistant field corn, sweet corn, soybean, cotton, and canola. In addition to its final registration decision, EPA is also releasing its final biological evaluation for the active ingredient under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This action is consistent with EPA’s obligations under the ESA and furthers the goals outlined in EPA’s April 2022 ESA Workplan.

The registration also contains mitigation measures to reduce exposure to non-target species and minimize impacts to federally endangered and threatened (listed) species and their designated critical habitats. Glufosinate-P is the first new active ingredient registration where EPA has used its new Herbicide Strategy Framework, released in August 2024, to inform the level of mitigation necessary to reduce exposure to listed species and critical habitat from runoff and erosion. The strategy is part of EPA’s broader plan to efficiently meet its ESA obligations by standardizing mitigation and protecting listed species from herbicides, including conventional herbicides used in agriculture, which allows EPA to meet its ESA obligations for glufosinate-P faster. Based on the Herbicide Strategy mitigation menu, glufosinate-P requires a low level of mitigations to reduce spray drift and other off-field risks.

Background on Glufosinate-P

Glufosinate-P and glufosinate-P ammonium (an isomer of the currently registered herbicide glufosinate and its ammonium salt, respectively) is a broad-spectrum herbicide that directly inhibits photosynthesis and causes excess ammonia build-up, which is generally toxic to plants in high concentrations.

Glufosinate-P has similar benefits and uses to the currently registered glufosinate herbicide products. These benefits include flexible application timing, which allows for postemergence weed control over the top of glufosinate-tolerant crops and for early season use in non-tolerant canola, corn, cotton, and soybean. The proposed glufosinate-P products result in less chemicals entering the environment compared to the currently registered glufosinate because they only require approximately half the application rate to be as effective.

Results of EPA’s Risk Assessments

Before issuing the final registration decision, EPA evaluated the potential hazardous effects and exposures to human health and the environment, as required by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). No human health risks of concern were identified for the uses of glufosinate-P. However, EPA’s ecological draft risk assessment identified potential risks for terrestrial and aquatic plants and chronic risk to mammals, bees, and other terrestrial invertebrates that may forage in treated fields and may be exposed to residues by consuming food exposed to off-site spray drift.

Mitigations

EPA is requiring the implementation of the following mitigation measures to address on- and off-field effects to non-target species, including listed species:

  • Prohibiting application during rainfall and when soils are saturated or above field capacity;
  • Requiring users to visit EPA’s Mitigation Menu Website before application and determine an appropriate strategy for meeting or exceeding the required number of mitigation points as specified on the label;
  • Maintaining a downwind buffer between the last spray row and the protection area of 50 feet for aerial application and 10 feet for ground application; and,
  • Instructing users to access and follow any applicable endangered species bulletins for the two listed species–the Spring Creek bladderpod plant and the whorled sunflower plant–from “Bulletins Live! Two” web-based system for all additional directions and restrictions.

With these mitigations in place, EPA’s final biological evaluation predicts that the use of glufosinate-P will not result in a likelihood of future jeopardy of any listed species, or a likelihood of adverse modification for any designated critical habitat.

EPA has initiated ESA consultation and shared its findings with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (collectively referred to as the Services). During formal consultation, the Services use the information in EPA’s final biological evaluation to inform their biological opinions. While EPA has made predictions about the potential likelihood of future jeopardy/adverse modification as part of its biological evaluation, the Services are responsible for making the actual final jeopardy/adverse modification findings and have the sole authority to do so. If the Services determine in their final biological opinions that additional mitigations are necessary to address any jeopardy/adverse modification determination or to address any unintentional harm known as incidental take, then EPA will work with the registrant to ensure that any necessary registration or labeling changes are made.

All the supporting documents related to glufosinate-P are available in EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0250. Please note that draft labels for BASF products are available in EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0250 and the draft labels for MCCLS products are available in EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0533.

October 18, 2024

Welcome to the October 18, 2024 issue of Cotton News, a service provided by Plains Cotton Growers Inc. for the cotton industry in the Texas High Plains and beyond.

The Mere Exposure Effect

Why It’s Important to Familiarize Young People with Cotton Clothing

By Kara Bishop

My grandmother used to make me “coffee” starting at two years old. She’d give me my own little cup and saucer with a tiny bit of coffee and a whole lot of milk. Coffee was a staple in my family’s household. Coffee reminds me of early mornings in Colorado during the summer when I would go to my grandparent’s camper in my pajamas to watch the sunrise. It’s what we drank on Sunday afternoons watching football.

Fast forward years later, and it’s a daily ritual in my home. I drink it regardless of whether I need it. Because it’s familiar. Because it’s nostalgic. Because, as weird as it sounds, it’s part of my identity.

I contribute financially to the coffee industry in large part because of what’s known as the “Mere Exposure Effect.”

The Mere Exposure Effect describes our tendency to develop preferences for things simply because we are familiar with them. And it can be effectively used to ensure that individuals purchase cotton clothing throughout their lifespan. When you dress a child in denim from infancy to teenager, chances are, they’re going to continue to purchase jeans for life.

Therefore, it makes sense to market and promote cotton to younger generations. That’s why Cotton Incorporated has partnered with Aéropostale — a retail chain that outfits high school students.

For the month of October, all 498 U.S. Aéropostale stores will feature cotton front and center. The front window display will model cotton styles with the messaging, “Keep It Real. Choose Comfort. Wear Cotton.”

Window display of the Aéropostale store in the Galleria Dallas Mall.

With this partnership, cotton clothing is in the front of the store pushing synthetic fiber apparel to the back — an effective marketing strategy. The retail store also has a cotton shop on their website to easily order cotton styles online.

This campaign is modeled after “The Fabric of Now,” but tweaked to resonate with a younger audience. The signage in the stores read “Real. Comfortable. Cotton. Because you’ll always remember how your outfit made you feel.” Feelings are very important in purchasing decisions. Much like coffee makes me think of precious memories I have with my family, we want these young people to associate their cotton outfits with an experience that’s significant to them.

The first display you see when you walk into any Aéropostale store in October.

I was impressed with the cotton content I saw in Aéropostale — even clothing with synthetic fiber was blended with cotton fabric for the most part. And it’s affordable, which will always make purchasing decisions for this demographic easier.

If you’re looking for cotton options for your children, this is a slam dunk. Visit the Aéropostale cotton shop here.

Back to Top